Stevens v Boyle

STEVENS v BOYLE
 
[2012] SASC 232
(3)  it is appropriate that the award include a component of aggravated compensatory damages, given the emails were sent as part of a continuing process of vilification of the plaintiff by the defendant and were calculated to injure his reputation, (at [53]);
 
 
  1. Seventhly, it is appropriate that the award include a component of aggravated compensatory damages.  That is because it is evident that the emails were sent as part of a continuing process of vilification of the plaintiff by the defendant and were obviously calculated to injure his reputation.  I am satisfied that the defendant was motivated by malice.  Although his state of mind is to be ignored (s 34), I am satisfied that the fact that the emails were made with a malicious intent increased the distressing effect for the plaintiff.  The defendant has not tendered any apology and, although he must be aware of these proceedings, has been indifferent to them.

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

©2022 Defamation Barrister

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?